Introduction to the multiple capitals approach in business

Introduction to the Multiple Capitals Approach in Business

The multiple capitals approach is a framework that extends the traditional business focus on financial capital to include other forms of capital that contribute to organizational success and sustainable development. This approach recognizes that businesses rely on and impact various forms of capital to create value.

 

 

Core Concept

The multiple capitals approach fundamentally redefines how organizations understand value creation by acknowledging that businesses depend on various forms of capital beyond just financial resources[2][6]. The essence of this concept is that capital represents a stock or asset that provides a flow of goods and services benefiting human wellbeing[2]. This broader understanding helps organizations make more holistic and sustainable decisions.

Types of Capitals

The multiple capitals framework typically includes several categories of capital:

1. Financial Capital: Traditional monetary resources and assets
2. Manufactured/Produced Capital: Human-made goods, infrastructure, and physical assets used to produce goods and services[2][7]
3. Natural Capital: The stock of renewable and non-renewable natural resources that yield benefits to people[6][7]
4. Human Capital: Knowledge, skills, competencies, and attributes embodied in individuals that contribute to improved performance and wellbeing[2][7]
5. Social Capital: Relationships, trust, and social cohesion that facilitate cooperation[2][3]
6. Intellectual Capital: Organizational knowledge, systems, procedures, and intellectual property[2]

Some frameworks may include additional capitals such as political, spiritual, and reputational capital depending on the specific model being used[3].

Business Applications

Organizations implement the multiple capitals approach to:

• Improve Decision-Making: By considering impacts and dependencies across all capitals, businesses can make more informed decisions that create broader value[8]
• Enhance Risk Management: Understanding dependencies on various capitals helps identify and mitigate previously overlooked risks[6]
• Drive Innovation: Recognizing multiple forms of value can inspire new business models and approaches[5]
• Strengthen Reporting: The approach provides a framework for more comprehensive reporting on organizational performance and impact[2]

Benefits of the Multiple Capitals Approach

Adopting a multiple capitals framework offers several advantages:

• Holistic Understanding: It provides organizations with a more complete picture of the system in which they operate[6][8]
• Value Identification: The approach helps identify previously undervalued or overlooked assets and resources[3]
• Sustainability Integration: It naturally aligns business operations with sustainable development goals and principles[6]
• Stakeholder Engagement: The framework facilitates better communication with diverse stakeholders about organizational impacts and dependencies[6]

Implementation Challenges

While valuable, implementing a multiple capitals approach comes with challenges:

• Measurement Complexity: Quantifying and valuing non-financial capitals can be difficult
• Integration Issues: Connecting multiple capitals assessment to existing business processes requires careful planning
• Trade-off Management: Balancing investments across different capitals involves complex decision-making

Practical Applications

Organizations are increasingly using the multiple capitals approach in various contexts:

• Strategic Planning: To identify opportunities and risks across all capitals
• Program Design: To simultaneously achieve mission fulfillment while increasing organizational effectiveness[3]
• Community Development: To identify and leverage previously overlooked community assets[3]
• Disaster Recovery: To guide recovery efforts and create grassroots prosperity and equity[3]

Evolution of the Approach

The multiple capitals approach has evolved from traditional economic thinking that focused primarily on financial and manufactured capital. Today, frameworks like the Integrated Reporting Framework by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) have formalized the approach, proposing six categories of capital that interact and interconnect with one another[2]. This evolution reflects growing recognition that capitals such as natural resources, human knowledge, and social cohesion are vital assets that businesses and the economy draw upon for their products and services[2].

The approach continues to gain traction as organizations recognize that their success depends on the value they receive from all capitals, and that understanding these holistic relationships provides a clear business case for protecting and investing in previously undervalued capitals[6].

 

Origin and background of the multiple capitals approach in business

Origin and Background of the Multiple Capitals Approach in Business

The multiple capitals approach represents a significant evolution in how businesses conceptualize value creation and sustainable development. This framework emerged as a response to the limitations of traditional economic thinking that focused primarily on financial capital.

Historical Context

The concept of multiple capitals originated as an approach to sustainable development theory that extends the traditional economic notion of capital to encompass broader sustainability issues[1]. Historically, conventional economic definitions of capital focused almost exclusively on manufactured goods that produce or facilitate the production of other goods and services[1]. This narrow view, however, failed to account for the vital inputs that businesses derive from the natural environment and society.

Conceptual Evolution

The fundamental shift in thinking came with the recognition that the essence of capital is that it represents "a stock or asset that provides a flow of goods and services for the benefit of human wellbeing"[1]. This broader understanding revealed that the traditional economic definition inadequately covered all sources from which businesses gain benefits.

As sustainability concerns grew globally, it became increasingly recognized that capitals such as natural resources, human knowledge, and social cohesion are vital stocks/assets upon which businesses and the broader economy draw for their products and services[1]. This recognition led to the development of various models considering multiple capitals, supported by different organizations and initiatives.

Institutional Development

A significant milestone in the formalization of the multiple capitals approach came with the work of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). Through their discussion paper "Towards Integrated Reporting: Communicating Value in the 21st Century," the IIRC proposed six categories of capital that interact and interconnect with one another[1][3]. These capitals—financial, manufactured, human, intellectual, natural, and social—were identified as the fundamental resources that organizations rely upon to function and deliver their products and services.

From Monocapitalism to Multicapitalism

The transition from traditional economic thinking to a multiple capitals approach has been characterized as a shift from "monocapitalism" to "multicapitalism"[3]. This transformation represents a bold and fundamental change in how businesses understand value creation.

While traditional business thinking focused primarily on financial and manufactured capitals (which were integral to financial reporting as it developed over centuries), the multiple capitals framework expanded to encompass:

• People (human capital)
• Society (social and relationship capital)
• Ideas (intellectual capital)
• Environment (natural capital)[3]

Theoretical Underpinnings

The theoretical foundation of the multiple capitals approach is rooted in the understanding that ignoring the depreciation of capitals upon which business models rely is unsustainable in the long term[3]. This concept of "connectivity" is crucial to integrated reporting, providing a tool that enables the analysis of trade-offs, mutual dependencies, and integration of multiple strands of value creation[3].

Contemporary Development

In recent years, the multiple capitals approach has gained significant traction as organizations increasingly recognize that their success depends on the value they receive from all capitals[5][8]. This growing awareness has led to the development of various frameworks and tools designed to help organizations identify, measure, and value their impacts and dependencies on multiple forms of capital.

The approach has been further strengthened by research demonstrating that traditional approaches to wealth creation can sometimes create a net loss of wealth when all capitals are considered. For example, one study found that the uncounted environmental costs of East Asian wheat and rice farming were approximately 500 billion in 2009, while the 2012 revenue from that farming was less than 100 billion[5].

Integration with Global Initiatives

The multiple capitals approach has been increasingly integrated with other global sustainability initiatives. By harmonizing natural, social, human, and economic issues, this approach connects to and builds upon existing frameworks like the UN Sustainable Development Goals[5]. It also identifies nexus issues and highlights opportunities for partnership and collaboration between various communities working across climate, biodiversity, and development.

The evolution of the multiple capitals approach represents a fundamental shift in business thinking—from a narrow focus on financial performance to a more holistic understanding of how organizations create value across multiple dimensions, leading to more sustainable and inclusive outcomes for businesses and society.

Core concepts and important principles of the multiple capitals approach in business

Core Concepts and Important Principles of the Multiple Capitals Approach in Business

The multiple capitals approach represents a fundamental shift in how businesses conceptualize value creation, moving beyond traditional financial metrics to embrace a more holistic understanding of organizational performance and impact. This framework encompasses several core concepts and guiding principles that are reshaping business thinking and practice.

Core Concepts

1. Expanded Definition of Capital

The multiple capitals concept suggests that there are various sources of value (capitals) that give rise to economic and social benefits, extending far beyond the financial capital that traditional accounting and economic approaches recognize[1]. This expanded view acknowledges that businesses depend on and impact multiple forms of capital simultaneously.

2. Types of Capitals

While different models may identify varying numbers of capitals, the most widely recognized framework comes from the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), which identifies six distinct but interconnected capitals:

• Financial capital: The pool of funds available for use in production or service provision
• Manufactured capital: Manufactured physical objects used in production or service provision
• Intellectual capital: Organizational knowledge and intangible assets
• Human capital: People's capabilities, competencies, experiences, and motivations
• Social and relationship capital: Institutions, relationships, and networks with communities and stakeholders
• Natural capital: Environmental resources and processes that provide goods and services[3][11][12]

3. Interdependence of Capitals

A fundamental concept in the multiple capitals approach is the recognition that these different forms of capital are deeply interconnected and interdependent[1][3]. Actions that affect one capital often have cascading effects on others, creating complex relationships that businesses must understand and manage.

4. Value Creation Across Capitals

The approach emphasizes that organizations create (or destroy) value across multiple dimensions simultaneously, not just in financial terms. This value creation occurs over different time horizons—short, medium, and long term—and affects various stakeholders differently[3].

Important Principles

1. Integrated Thinking

The multiple capitals approach promotes "integrated thinking," which involves actively considering the relationships between an organization's various operating units, functions, and the capitals it uses or affects[3]. This holistic perspective enables more comprehensive decision-making that accounts for broader impacts and dependencies.

2. Stewardship of All Capitals

A core principle is that organizations should aim to maintain and enhance all forms of capital rather than depleting them[3]. This stewardship approach recognizes that sustainable business success depends on the health and resilience of all capitals, not just financial ones.

3. Impacts and Dependencies Assessment

Organizations should assess both their impacts on different capitals and their dependencies on them[5]. This dual focus helps businesses understand not only how they affect the world but also how their own success relies on the continued availability and quality of various capitals.

4. Beyond Traditional CSR

The multiple capitals approach goes beyond traditional corporate social responsibility (CSR) by:

• Focusing on both impacts and dependencies
• Integrating capital considerations into core business strategy rather than treating them as peripheral concerns
• Providing a more comprehensive framework for understanding organizational performance[5]

5. Measurement and Valuation

The approach emphasizes the importance of measuring and valuing impacts and dependencies across all capitals, even when they cannot be easily quantified in financial terms[5][10]. This principle acknowledges that what gets measured gets managed, and that proper valuation of all capitals is essential for informed decision-making.

6. Balanced Optimization

Rather than maximizing financial capital at the expense of other capitals, the approach seeks a balanced optimization that recognizes trade-offs and seeks to create value across all capitals[1][3]. This principle acknowledges that some decisions may involve difficult choices between different forms of capital.

7. Systemic Perspective

The multiple capitals approach encourages organizations to adopt a systems perspective, recognizing that they operate within broader social, economic, and environmental systems[2][6]. This perspective helps businesses understand how their actions contribute to or detract from system-wide sustainability and resilience.

Practical Applications

In practice, the multiple capitals approach is being implemented through various frameworks and tools:

• Integrated Reporting: The IIRC's Integrated Reporting Framework helps organizations communicate how they create value across multiple capitals over time[3][11].
• Multicapital Scorecard: This performance measurement model indicates how far an organization is from performing sustainably across multiple dimensions[10].
• Capitals Assessments: Structured assessments help organizations identify, measure, and value their impacts and dependencies on different capitals[6].
• Community Development: The approach has been applied to community development initiatives, helping stakeholders identify a broader range of community assets and guide more holistic development strategies[2].

Benefits and Outcomes

When effectively implemented, the multiple capitals approach can lead to several positive outcomes:

• More holistic understanding of organizational performance and impact
• Better-informed decision-making that considers broader consequences
• Enhanced risk management through identification of dependencies
• Improved stakeholder relationships through more comprehensive accountability
• Greater alignment between business activities and societal needs
• Increased long-term resilience and sustainability[5][6]

The multiple capitals approach represents a significant evolution in business thinking, offering a framework that better aligns organizational success with broader societal and environmental wellbeing. By recognizing and managing multiple forms of capital, businesses can create more sustainable value for themselves and their stakeholders while contributing to addressing global challenges like climate change and inequality.

Current applications of the multiple capitals approach in business

Current Applications of the Multiple Capitals Approach in Business

The multiple capitals approach has moved beyond theoretical frameworks to practical implementation across various business contexts. Organizations worldwide are increasingly adopting this holistic model to better understand, measure, and communicate their value creation processes. Below are the key current applications of this approach in business settings.

Integrated Reporting

The International Integrated Reporting Council's (IIRC) Integrated Reporting (IR) Framework has become one of the most significant practical applications of the multiple capitals approach. This framework:

• Emphasizes "Integrated Thinking" by actively considering relationships between organizational units, functions, and the six capitals
• Focuses on value creation over short, medium, and long-term time horizons
• Provides a structure for accountability across multiple capitals in corporate reporting[3]

Many businesses have successfully implemented this framework. For example:

• Iberdrola, a European utilities company, uses the framework to describe how its resources have been managed to create value, providing both narrative and quantitative information for each capital[1]
• Italian consumer goods businesses have adopted the approach to explain their value creation processes across multiple capitals[1]

Multicapital Scorecard Implementation

The Multicapital Scorecard has emerged as a key performance measurement tool that helps organizations implement a multicapital approach effectively[3]. This practical tool:

• Involves a three-step implementation process
• Allows organizations to tabulate scores for each Area of Impact (AOI)
• Groups impacts into respective bottom lines
• Integrates scores across the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) and for the organization as a whole[3]

Strategic Decision-Making

Businesses are increasingly using the multiple capitals approach to inform strategic decision-making:

• ABN AMRO, a bank in the Netherlands, implemented multi-capital planning and accounting in 2014, leading to healthier employees, happier customers, clarity about negative externalities, recognition as a sustainability expert, and alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals[8]
• Organizations are using the approach to identify, measure, and value their impacts and dependencies on different capitals, providing a more holistic understanding of the system in which they operate[6]

Risk Management

The multiple capitals approach is being applied to enhance risk management practices:

• Businesses are using capitals assessments to map and limit their exposure to environmental and social variables across global portfolios[6]
• Following guidance from the Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure, companies are measuring and disclosing data on their most material impacts and dependencies on nature and society to assess physical, regulatory, and systemic risks[9]
• These risk assessments establish baselines for developing corporate sustainability strategies on biodiversity, natural capital, climate change, and social impact[9]

Community and Economic Development

The approach has been extended beyond individual organizations to community and economic development:

• The HomeTown Competitiveness initiative in rural Nebraska used a multiple capitals approach that created a "spiraling up" effect, where investment in one type of capital produced a cascade of positive feedback that activated other latent forms of capital[8]
• This led to increased knowledge and skills of participants (human and intellectual capital), new shared norms of community involvement (cultural capital), broader participation in civic affairs (social capital), and networks that attracted new financial investments and manufacturing infrastructure[8]

Biodiversity and Natural Capital Assessment

Specialized applications of the multiple capitals approach are emerging for specific capitals:

• The Cambridge Conservation Initiative has developed tools to help practitioners undertake biodiversity-inclusive natural capital assessments[6]
• These tools offer supporting resources, methodologies, and advice to assist organizations in understanding, measuring, and valuing the benefits that biodiversity provides[6]

Value Creation Measurement

Organizations are using the multiple capitals approach to redefine how they measure and communicate value:

• The Balboa Park Cultural Partnership, an arts and culture collaborative, used a multi-capital framework to grow its annual revenue from 125,000 to 5 million over 15 years[8]
• SEED SPOT, a nonprofit supporting social entrepreneurs, achieved 274 percent growth in reaching innovative business people (72.4 percent of whom are from underrepresented groups) by applying a multi-capitalism approach[8]

Sustainability Strategy Development

The five capitals model (natural, human, social, manufactured, and financial) is being used to form comprehensive sustainable development strategies:

• Organizations are employing sustainability data and technological governance for corporate risk decision-making[9]
• Companies are developing adaptive management plans to operate safely under science-based targets, responding to nature, social, physical, regulatory, and systemic risks[9]

Challenges in Implementation

Despite growing adoption, businesses face several challenges in implementing the multiple capitals approach:

• There remain significant conceptual and structural challenges to overcome before a multi-capitals approach can be fully effective in driving a balanced and sustainable world[2]
• The interdependencies between capitals create complexity that requires a focus on valuing these relationships[2]
• Current market forces often prioritize short-term market movements over longevity and stability, making it difficult for individual organizations to fully embrace the approach[2]

Future Trajectory

The multiple capitals approach is still evolving, with businesses at different stages of implementation:

• Many organizations are at the beginning of their journey to reform concepts of value[2]
• The capitals approach provides a "topographical guide" to the territory businesses must traverse, though the specific route remains uncertain[2]
• Full realization of the value of multiple capital approaches will only occur when economic systems and markets are founded on the understanding that maintaining and growing all capitals is a precondition rather than an afterthought[2]

The current applications demonstrate that the multiple capitals approach is moving from theory to practice across diverse business contexts. As more organizations adopt and refine these practices, we can expect to see continued innovation in how businesses understand, measure, and communicate their relationships with all forms of capital.

Challenges and controversies faced by the multiple capitals approach in business

Challenges and Controversies Faced by the Multiple Capitals Approach in Business

The multiple capitals approach, while gaining traction in the business world, faces several challenges and controversies that hinder its widespread adoption and effective implementation. These challenges stem from conceptual, practical, and regulatory dimensions, as well as the inherent complexities of integrating multiple forms of capital into traditional business practices.

Conceptual Challenges

1. Understanding and Valuation of Capitals: One of the primary challenges is the difficulty in defining and valuing the various forms of capital—financial, manufactured, human, social, natural, and intellectual. Each type of capital has unique characteristics and impacts, making it complex to establish a standardized method for measurement and valuation. This complexity can lead to inconsistencies in how organizations report and manage their capitals[2][10].
2. Interdependencies Between Capitals: The interrelationships and dependencies among different capitals complicate the assessment of their individual and collective impacts. Organizations often struggle to quantify how changes in one capital affect others, which can lead to incomplete or misleading analyses of value creation and sustainability[7][9].
3. Lack of Common Terminology: The terminology surrounding multiple capitals can vary significantly across different frameworks and organizations. This lack of standardization can create confusion and hinder effective communication among stakeholders, including investors, regulators, and the public[6][7].

Practical Challenges

1. Integration into Existing Frameworks: Many businesses operate within traditional financial frameworks that prioritize short-term financial returns. Integrating a multiple capitals approach requires a fundamental shift in how organizations think about value creation, which can be met with resistance from stakeholders accustomed to conventional metrics[1][5].
2. Data Availability and Quality: Collecting reliable data on non-financial capitals can be challenging. Organizations may lack the necessary systems and processes to gather, analyze, and report on these capitals effectively. This data gap can undermine the credibility of the multiple capitals approach and its associated reporting practices[10][17].
3. Resource Intensity: Implementing a multiple capitals approach can be resource-intensive, requiring significant time, expertise, and financial investment. Smaller organizations, in particular, may find it difficult to allocate the necessary resources to adopt and maintain such comprehensive frameworks[17].

Regulatory and Market Challenges

1. Regulatory Frameworks: The lack of clear regulatory guidelines on how to implement and report on multiple capitals can create uncertainty for businesses. While frameworks like the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) provide guidance, the absence of mandatory requirements means that many organizations may choose to continue with traditional reporting methods[2][6].
2. Market Perception and Investor Interest: There is often a disconnect between the principles of the multiple capitals approach and the priorities of investors and market analysts, who may focus primarily on financial performance. This can lead to skepticism about the relevance and importance of non-financial capitals, making it difficult for organizations to justify their investments in sustainability initiatives[7][9].
3. Controversies Over Measurement: The debate over how to measure and report on multiple capitals can lead to controversies. Some critics argue that attempts to quantify social and environmental impacts in monetary terms can oversimplify complex issues and may not accurately reflect the true value of these capitals. This raises ethical questions about the commodification of social and environmental goods[6][8].

Conclusion

The multiple capitals approach represents a significant shift in how businesses can understand and create value. However, the challenges and controversies it faces—ranging from conceptual difficulties and practical implementation issues to regulatory uncertainties and market skepticism—must be addressed for it to achieve its full potential. As organizations continue to explore and adopt this approach, ongoing dialogue and collaboration among stakeholders will be essential to navigate these complexities and enhance the effectiveness of multiple capitals frameworks in driving sustainable business practices.

Future trends of the multiple capitals approach in business

Future Trends of the Multiple Capitals Approach in Business

The multiple capitals approach is increasingly recognized as a vital framework for businesses aiming to enhance sustainability and value creation. As organizations continue to adapt to changing economic, social, and environmental landscapes, several key trends are emerging that will shape the future of this approach.

1. Integration into Mainstream Business Practices

The multiple capitals approach is expected to become more integrated into mainstream business practices. Companies are increasingly recognizing the importance of non-financial capitals—such as social, natural, and human capital—in their overall strategy and reporting. This shift is driven by a growing demand from stakeholders for transparency and accountability regarding how businesses impact various forms of capital. The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and other organizations are promoting frameworks that encourage businesses to adopt integrated thinking, which considers the interdependencies between different capitals[1][8].

2. Enhanced Measurement and Reporting Standards

As the demand for accountability grows, there will likely be advancements in the measurement and reporting standards for multiple capitals. Companies will increasingly adopt standardized metrics and frameworks to assess their impacts on various capitals. This will facilitate better comparisons across organizations and industries, making it easier for investors and stakeholders to evaluate performance. The development of tools like the Multiple Capital Scorecard will play a crucial role in this evolution, providing a structured methodology for measuring and reporting on multiple capitals[1][12].

3. Focus on Stakeholder Engagement

Future trends will likely emphasize greater stakeholder engagement in the multiple capitals approach. Businesses will need to actively involve stakeholders—such as employees, customers, suppliers, and communities—in discussions about how different capitals are managed and valued. This participatory approach can enhance trust and collaboration, leading to more sustainable outcomes. Organizations that prioritize stakeholder engagement will be better positioned to identify risks and opportunities related to their capital impacts[4][10].

4. Technological Advancements and Data Utilization

The integration of technology will significantly influence the future of the multiple capitals approach. Advances in data analytics, artificial intelligence, and blockchain technology will enable organizations to collect, analyze, and report data on multiple capitals more effectively. These technologies can help businesses track their impacts in real-time, allowing for more agile decision-making and improved resource allocation. As a result, organizations will be able to demonstrate their value creation across all capitals more transparently[6][9].

5. Regulatory and Policy Developments

Regulatory frameworks are expected to evolve to support the adoption of the multiple capitals approach. Governments and regulatory bodies may introduce policies that require companies to disclose their impacts on various capitals, similar to existing financial reporting requirements. This regulatory push will encourage businesses to adopt more comprehensive sustainability practices and integrate multiple capitals into their core strategies[2][11].

6. Emphasis on Resilience and Adaptability

In an increasingly volatile world, businesses will focus on building resilience through the multiple capitals approach. Organizations will recognize that their long-term success depends on their ability to adapt to changing conditions, including climate change, social unrest, and economic shifts. By valuing and investing in diverse capitals, businesses can enhance their resilience and ensure sustainable growth in the face of uncertainty[3][7].

Conclusion

The future of the multiple capitals approach in business is poised for significant growth and transformation. As organizations increasingly recognize the interconnectedness of various forms of capital, they will adopt more integrated, transparent, and stakeholder-focused practices. With advancements in measurement, technology, and regulatory support, the multiple capitals approach will play a crucial role in shaping sustainable business strategies and driving long-term value creation.

 

References

 

• THRIVE Framework: The Multicapital Approach. (n.d.). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• The Capitals Approach is Integral to Transforming Decision Making. (2022, May 25). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• From Monocapitalism to Multicapitalism: 21st Century System. (2018, June 12). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• Multiple Capitals Disclosure in European Companies. (2023). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• Nonprofit Capacity Building: A Multiple-Capitals Approach. (2019, July 16). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• The Power of the Multi-Capital Model for ESG Value Creation. (2022, October 27). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• Capitals Coalition and INSEAD Undertake Study to Ascertain Challenges in Adoption. (2023, October 25). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• Exploring integrated reporting in the banking industry. (2024, December 9). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• Exploring metaphors of capitals and the framing of multiple capitals. (2015). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• All capitals are unequal but some are more unequal than others. (2015, January 19). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• The 'multicapital' scorecard measures the triple bottom line. (2017, November 18). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• 5 Capitals Model for Sustainable Development Strategy. (n.d.). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• Does Multiple Capitals Disclosure Affect the Capital Market? (2022). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• Exploring metaphors of capitals and the framing of multiple capitals. (2024, October 22). Retrieved from [source not provided]
• Use of a multiple capital framework to identify improvements in sustainable development. (2018). Retrieved from [source not provided]

 

 

 

 

======

2025.03.12:  initially archive